Land use conflicts have caused delays in the issuance of commercial guidance notifications in several prime sectors, creating uncertainty for developers, investors, and businesses eager to capitalize on high-value urban opportunities. In many cases, disputes have arisen over whether certain parcels should be reserved for residential, institutional, green space, or commercial use, leading to prolonged discussions among planning authorities, civic bodies, and community stakeholders. These disagreements have stalled the finalization of updated guidance values, preventing the market from receiving clear direction on property pricing and regulatory expectations in some of the most sought-after areas.

The delay is having a ripple effect across the real estate sector, with potential transactions, project launches, and investment decisions being put on hold until the land use classifications are conclusively determined. Developers who had anticipated leveraging new commercial guidance values to structure project plans are being forced to reassess their strategies, while investors are adopting a cautious wait-and-watch approach. Authorities are under pressure to resolve the conflicts swiftly and transparently, as prolonged uncertainty could slow down urban development momentum and lead to missed opportunities for economic growth and infrastructure advancement.

Resolving land use conflicts and promptly issuing clear commercial guidance notifications are seen as critical to restoring confidence in the real estate market. Stakeholders are advocating for a balanced approach that considers long-term urban planning objectives, community needs, and economic potential. Once the disputes are settled and guidance rates are formally notified, prime sectors are expected to witness a surge in activity, unlocking a new wave of development that could redefine the commercial landscape and strengthen the city’s position as a dynamic economic center.